Diagnostic Substitution

The easiest statistic for the health department to manipulate is the number of “cases” (otherwise known as positive PCR tests). If you’re unfamiliar with the problems of the PCR tests, please visit our site to learn why public policy should not be reliant upon these tests.

The number of COVID cases has been manipulated in various ways.

By far, the most extensive strategy is “diagnostic substitution”. Flu is now called COVID.

We don’t need charts and graphs to see this. It’s right in front of our eyes.

The definition of a COVID case allows flu in the door. There is nothing unique about that definition. For example, a cough, or chills and fever, would constitute “a mild case of COVID.”

A positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 would also be required, but as we show in recent studies on the test, obtaining a false positive is as easy as pie. The W.H.O. is even concerned.

All you have to do is run the test at more than 35 cycles. Most labs run the test at 40 cycles and some like Health Partners use 45 cycles! A cycle is a quantum leap in magnification of the swab sample taken from the patient. When you run the test at more than 35 cycles, false-positives come pouring out like water from a fire hose. Even Dr. Fauci admits anything over 35 cycles is worthless.

So…with ordinary flu symptoms plus a false-positive PCR test…voila, you have a COVID case.

Keep in mind that, overwhelmingly, most COVID cases are mild. In other words, they’re indistinguishable from ordinary flu.

If you really need “charts and graphs”, here is last week’s MN Flu Weekly report:
https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/flu/stats/flustats07.pdf

And now compare that the same report from 12 months ago:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200411121056/https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/flu/stats/flustats07.pdf

Other referenced facts from official government/scientific websites are available at https://maskoffmn.org