The Covid-19 Crisis is a Fraud

According to their own data, there is no emergency!
Please visit each source to verify for yourself!

Unreliable Tests

PCR tests are not testing for a virus. In reality, they are testing for fragments of genetic material that *may* indicate its presence, but can be triggered by any one of a number of different causes (including high amounts of false positives).

Some people can test positive and negative in the same day!
———————————-

The CDC admits antibody tests are not accurate.
…testing at this point might result in relatively more false-positive resultsSome tests may exhibit cross-reactivity with other coronaviruses, such as those that cause the common cold.
———————————-
The MN Dept. of Health admits:Antigen tests are not considered to be as reliable as PCR tests.
———————————-
“The saliva test is a PCR test, just like the traditional nasal swab, with the same effectiveness rate.” The MN Dept. of Health

Padded Death Count

The CDC states only 6% of all deaths were from Covid-19 alone and the rest had numerous comorbidities. The U.S. Covid-19 death count includes people who died of suicide, homicide, drownings, fire exposure, gun shot wounds, fall from playground equipment, alcohol poisoning, failed pregnancies, failed abortions, motor cycle accidents, bus accidents, car accidents, overdoses, exposure to fire, falls from ladder and a whole lot more that have nothing to do with a deadly virus. Look up the ICD codes yourself!

See examples ICD codes here but make sure to verify for yourself. How many deaths were unavoidable with or without Covid-19? As you’ll see, many…

IFR Similar to Flu

The CDC’s best estimate of the Infection Fatality Ration puts it on par with influenza:

0-19 years: 0.003%
20-49 years: 0.02%
50-69 years: 0.5%
70+ years: 5.4%
————————————-
IFR is between 0.00% to 1.63% – The W.H.O.
————————————
————————————
Infection fatality ratio is about 1% – Imperial College London
————————————
According to this study: The overall noninstitutionalized IFR was 0.26%.

“False Positive Test Results

At least half of all positive tests could be false positives according to Dr. Birx,  the Coronavirus Response Coordinator for the White House Coronavirus Task Force

Michael Yeadon: former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer said …all or a substantial part of these positives could be due to what’s called false positives tests.

Dr. Fauci admitted back in July 2020 that if a person tests positive with a PCR test set to 35 or more cycle thresholds,  that person is not infectious. HealthPartners’ lab uses thresholds that vary from 40 to 45. He also admits that the CTs aren’t included with the test results.

According to this report, 90 out of 144 “positives” were false positives.

In this now withdrawn study, the conclusion is: “In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals’ reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives.

We’re told that up to 80% of “infections” are asymptomatic. We must ask the question: are they really asymptomatic or simply false positives?

This study says: “most of these false positive individuals would likely be asymptomatic, which could at least partially explain the reports of large numbers of asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2.”

This study from October 2020 concludes: “It is likely that at current active disease prevalence the positive rRT-PCR results of many “asymptomatic” persons are false positives.” 

Learn more about false positives here

Deaths *with* Covid-19

Dr. Birx and others have admitted they’re counting anyone who died of any cause but had a Covid-19 positive test, as a Covid-19 death.

Dr. Ngozi Ezike, director of the Illinois Department of Public Health said: “At the time of death, it was a covid positive diagnose… even if you die of a clear alternate cause, but you had Covid at the same time it still listed as a Covid death…”

Keep this in mind when examining the comorbidities explained above…

Asymptomatic Spread is “Rare”

massive new study released in Nov. 2020 conducted in Wuhan, China, and published in the respected scientific journal Nature, reports that asymptomatic persons who have tested positive for Covid-19 do not pass on the infection to others.

Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said It still appears to be rare that a asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward.  She said it was “rare” 3 times. The next day, due to political pressure, the WHO stepped back from her statement but did not contradict it.

Dr. Fauci early in the pandemic had this to say about asymptomatic spread: “..in all the history of respiratory born viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks…

The World Health Organization reported on four individual studies that found between 0% and 2.2% of people with asymptomatic infection infected anyone else. They conclude: “…individuals without symptoms are less likely to transmit the virus than those who develop symptoms.”

This study stated: “…transmission capacity from asymptomatic cases was limited. This supports the view of the World Health Organization that asymptomatic cases were not the major drivers of the overall epidemic dynamics.”

In this study, the researchers exposed an asymptomatic covid19 positive invidual to 455 uninfected and tracked the infection rate. Of those 455, 0 became infected.

This study states: “While asymptomatic individuals can transmit the infection, their relative degree of infectiousness seems to be limited.”

This study concluded: “Currently, there is no clear evidence that COVID-19 asymptomatic persons can transmit SARS-CoV-2”

Keep in mind this is the primary reason we’re told to wear masks “just in case you’re an asymptomatic spreader”…

Lockdown Deaths

Dr. Robert Redfield, Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said: , said We’re seeing, sadly, far greater suicides now than we are deaths from COVID. We’re seeing far greater deaths from drug overdose that are above excess that we had as background than we are seeing the deaths from COVID…”

The CDC recently released it’s new “excess death” stats that show 100,967 people died this year who shouldn’t have and they were not Covid-19 deaths. The largest percentage was adults aged 25-44…

California doctors say “we’ve seen a year’s worth of suicide attempts in the last four weeks” because of the impact lockdown is having on mental health.

“The proportion of emergency room visits for mental health concerns in children & adolescents increased substantially this past Mar.-Oct.” CDC

According to the CDC, one quarter of American young adults have thought about committing suicide since the beginning of this panic epidemic.

Stanford Professor Warns COVID Shelter-in-Place Orders Are ‘Killing People

In Canada, “Cancer surgeons in Ontario are reporting a sharp rise in the number of people coming to hospital with advanced cancers. It’s an unintended consequence of the sudden shutdown of non-urgent health-care services during the spring wave of COVID-19.

Canadian report saysOpioid deaths skyrocket, mental health suffers due to pandemic restrictions” 

In New York, “opioid deaths skyrocket during coronavirus pandemic”

In Wisconsin, “Suicides up in Dane County, mental health experts see link to COVID-19”

Ultimately it’s becoming apparent that Lockdowns May Have Had Little Effect on COVID-19 Spread

“New data suggest that social distancing and reopening haven’t determined the spread.” The Wall Street Journal

“265 million people are expected to be thrown into severe food insecurity.” The Lancet

Even the W.H.O. says they do not advocate for lockdowns as it could end up be doubling of world poverty and childhood malnutrition

If you are advocating for lockdowns, you are advocating for some portion of the population to be consigned to death.

Strained Resources?

As of October 30th, 2020: Only 3 % of people admitted to ER’s are Covid related.“During week 43, the percentages of ED visits captured in NSSP for CLI (Covid Like Illness) and ILI(influenza like illness), were 3.0% and 1.1%, respectively” Oct. 30th 2020 CDC Covid Weekly (page 4)

According to the MN Department of Health Covid Weekly ending October 29th, 2020, the proportion of hospital-treated cases for Covid-like illness (CLI) is less than 3%

According to U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, as of 11-9-2020,  8.66% of Inpatient Beds are occupied by COVID-19 patients.

Hospitals are laying off employees and some are shutting down:

Fairview to shut Bethesda, St. Joseph’s hospitals in St. Paul

U.S. Field Hospitals Stand Down, Most Without Treating Any COVID-19 Patients

Temporary morgue in St. Paul used to store protective items instead of bodies

Children’s Minnesota eliminating 150 jobs in midst of COVID-19

If the hospitals were strained with Covid patients, they wouldn’t be laying off their employees and closing down facilities like “Bethesda” hospital in St. Paul which was specially reconfigured to treat Covid patients. During this “crisis” this is the last hospital you’d expect to see shut down due to financial losses…

 

Let’s talk about masking up in mn

Consider this…
In the 1919 influenza pandemic, masks were available and were dispensed to populations, but they had no impact on the epidemic curve.Shane Neilson MD, PhD
——————————————
“No study has demonstrated actual clinical evidence of the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2” Penn Healthcare Epidemiologists’ Workgroup
——————————————
Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”  CDC
——————————————
The Danish randomized controlled trial on the real-world efficacy of face masks against coronavirus infection – the first of its kind – has now been published in the Annals of Internal Medicine. As expected, the trial found no statistically significant benefit of wearing a face mask.
——————————————
This trial was done with health care workers and concluded that cloth masks were not only ineffective but also had a higher rates of infection when using cloth masks.
——————————————
This study concluded: Compared to no masks there was no reduction of influenza-like illness or influenza for masks in the general population, nor in healthcare workers
——————————————
“At present, there is no direct evidence (from studies on COVID-19 and in healthy people in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.” The W.H.O
——————————————
This study concluded, there was no reduction of influenza-like illnesses (ILI) with mask use compared to no masks. Also “cloth surgical masks should not be used as they are associated with a higher risk of ILI and penetration of microorganisims.”
——————————————
Does wearing a mask decrease oxygen? This study concludes: “Our study revealed a decrease in the oxygen saturation of arterial pulsations…
——————————————
Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence. Swiss Policy Research
——————————————
This study on the use of cloth masks concluded: “Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97%… Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.
——————————————

Joe Rogan: “I see people walking around with masks on wearing gloves, is that nonsense?”

Michael Osterholm: “Largely yes”

——————————————
——————————————
“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.” The New England Journal of Medicine article
——————————————
So if masks are ineffective in preventing flu how can they be effective with preventing Covid-19 transmission when it’s believed to be similar? “Most experts think that flu viruses spread mainly by droplets made when people with flu cough, sneeze or talk,” says the CDC
——————————————
Furthermore, there is no way for government officials to be able to reasonably decide for every individual whether it is appropriate for that individual to wear a mask in public because the appropriateness of mask use depends on that individual’s unique circumstances.
The only thing a mask has been proven to be good for is for keeping the fear front and center.

More On PCR False Positives…

"The reliability of COVID-19 tests is uncertain due to the limited evidence base. Available evidence mainly comes from symptomatic patients, and their clinical role in detecting asymptomatic carriers is unclear. There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests."

"caution needs to be applied to the results as it often does not detect infectious virus. PCR results may lead to restrictions for large groups of people who do not present an infection risk."

"Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms. The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection. This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens."

"False-positive test results are more likely when prevalence is moderate to low."

"It has been widely reported that the RT-qPCR [Reverse Transcriptase quantitative PCR] test kits used to detect SARSCoV-2 RNA in human specimens are generating many false positive results and are not sensitive enough to detect some real positive cases."

"I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine."

Dr. David Rasnick, biochemist and protease developer.

"PCR does not distinguish between infectious virus and non-infectious nucleic acid"

"...all or a substantial part of these positives could be due to what's called false positives tests."

"Detection of viral RNA does not necessarily mean that a person is infectious and able to transmit the virus to another person"

"The challenge is the false positive rate is very high, so only seven percent of tests will be successful in identifying those that actually have the the virus. So the truth is, we can’t just rely on that…”

"positive results […] do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite."

"...up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus."

"A positive RT-qPCR result may not necessarily mean the person is still infectious or that he or she still has any meaningful disease."

 Michael R Tom, Michael J Mina

“To Interpret the SARS-CoV-2 Test, Consider the Cycle Threshold Value”

"PCR-based testing produces enough false positive results to make positive results highly unreliable over a broad range of real-world scenarios."

"...false positive results will occur regularly, despite high specificity, causing unnecessary community isolation and contact tracing, and nosocomial infection if inpatients with false positive tests are cohorted with infectious patients."

"...PCR is not able to distinguish whether infectious virus is present. "

"...no single gold standard assay exists. The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be somewhere between 0·8% and 4·0%."

"...detection of viral RNA by qRT-PCR does not necessarily equate to infectiousness, and viral culture from PCR positive upper respiratory tract samples has been rarely positive beyond nine days of illness."

"...you can find almost anything in anybody...it doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you..."