The Covid-19 Crisis is a Fraud
According to their own data, there is no emergency!
Please visit each source to verify for yourself!
Unreliable & Unproven Tests
Some people can test positive and negative in the same day!
The W.H.O admitted on 12-7-2020 about the PCR tests: “In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.“
A Lancet Article published February 2021 Suggests 50-75% of “Positive” PCR Tests Are Not Infectious People
Padded Death Count
The CDC states only 6% of all deaths were from Covid-19 alone and the rest had numerous comorbidities. The U.S. Covid-19 death count includes people who died of suicide, homicide, drownings, fire exposure, gun shot wounds, fall from playground equipment, alcohol poisoning, failed pregnancies, failed abortions, motor cycle accidents, bus accidents, car accidents, overdoses, exposure to fire, falls from ladder and a whole lot more that have nothing to do with a deadly virus. Look up the ICD codes yourself!
See examples ICD codes here but make sure to verify for yourself. How many deaths were unavoidable with or without Covid-19? As you’ll see, many…
IFR Similar to Flu
The CDC’s best estimate of the Infection Fatality Ratio puts it on par with influenza:
“False Positive Test Results
At least half of all positive tests could be false positives according to Dr. Birx, the Coronavirus Response Coordinator for the White House Coronavirus Task Force
Michael Yeadon: former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer said “…all or a substantial part of these positives could be due to what’s called false positives tests.“
Dr. Barbara Yaffe, the Associate Medical Officer of Health for Toronto Public Health, admitted that in some cases, you’ll get false positives almost half of the time.
Dr. Fauci admitted back in July 2020 that if a person tests positive with a PCR test set to 35 or more cycle thresholds, that person is not infectious. HealthPartners’ lab uses thresholds that vary from 40 to 45. Fauci also admits that the CTs aren’t included with the test results. Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory says when using cycle thresholds 24 & higher the specimens “were viral culture negative“
According to this report, 90 out of 144 “positives” were false positives.
In this now withdrawn study, the conclusion is: “In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals’ reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives.“
We’re told that up to 80% of “infections” are asymptomatic. We must ask the question: are they really asymptomatic or simply false positives?
This study says: “most of these false positive individuals would likely be asymptomatic, which could at least partially explain the reports of large numbers of asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2.”
This study from October 2020 concludes: “It is likely that at current active disease prevalence the positive rRT-PCR results of many “asymptomatic” persons are false positives.”
Learn more about false positives here
Deaths *with* Covid-19
Dr. Birx and others have admitted they’re counting anyone who died of any cause but had a Covid-19 positive test, as a Covid-19 death.
Dr. Ngozi Ezike, director of the Illinois Department of Public Health said: “At the time of death, it was a covid positive diagnose… even if you die of a clear alternate cause, but you had Covid at the same time it still listed as a Covid death…”
Keep this in mind when examining the comorbidities explained above…
Airborne Transmission Is Not Proven
“No study has demonstrated actual clinical evidence of the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2” Penn Healthcare Epidemiologists’ Workgroup
In an analysis of 3 COVID-19 cases within hospital rooms in China, there were no reports of airborne transmission
Another analysis did not identify any SARS-CoV-2 in air samples collected at distances of 10 cm from patient’s not wearing a mask.
“The epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 indicates that most infections are spread through close contact, not airborne transmission” CDC
“To date, transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by this type of aerosol route has not been demonstrated; much more research is needed given the possible implications of such route of transmission” The World Health Organization
Asymptomatic Spread is “Rare”
A massive new study released in Nov. 2020 conducted in Wuhan, China, and published in the respected scientific journal Nature, reports that asymptomatic persons who have tested positive for Covid-19 do not pass on the infection to others.
December 2020: A meta-analysis of 54 studies with 77,758 participants finds household secondary attack rate (chance an infected person will infect one or more people at home) is 18% if the index case is symptomatic and 0.7% if asymptomatic.
Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said “It still appears to be rare that a asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward.“ She said it was “rare” 3 times. The next day, due to political pressure, the WHO stepped back from her statement but did not contradict it.
Dr. Fauci early in the pandemic had this to say about asymptomatic spread: “..in all the history of respiratory born viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks…“
The World Health Organization reported on four individual studies that found between 0% and 2.2% of people with asymptomatic infection infected anyone else. They conclude: “…individuals without symptoms are less likely to transmit the virus than those who develop symptoms.”
This study stated: “…transmission capacity from asymptomatic cases was limited. This supports the view of the World Health Organization that asymptomatic cases were not the major drivers of the overall epidemic dynamics.”
In this study, the researchers exposed an asymptomatic covid19 positive invidual to 455 uninfected and tracked the infection rate. Of those 455, 0 became infected.
This study states: “While asymptomatic individuals can transmit the infection, their relative degree of infectiousness seems to be limited.”
Keep in mind this is the primary reason we’re told to wear masks “just in case you’re an asymptomatic spreader”…
Lockdown Deaths & Despair
Dr. Robert Redfield, Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said: , said “We’re seeing, sadly, far greater suicides now than we are deaths from COVID. We’re seeing far greater deaths from drug overdose that are above excess that we had as background than we are seeing the deaths from COVID…”
This study finds lockdowns are 10 times more costly to public health than not locking down.
Now that the 2020 figures have been properly tallied, there is still no convincing evidence that strict lockdowns reduced the death toll from COVID-19. But one effect is clear: more deaths from other causes, especially among the young and middle-aged, minorities and the less affluent.
In March and April 2020, mental health claim lines for individuals aged 13-18, as a percentage of all medical claim lines, approximately doubled over the same months in the previous year. At the height of the spring wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, this rise in mental health claim lines amounted to 97.0 percent in March and 103.5 percent in April. These are among the many findings in FAIR Health’s new white paper, the seventh in its COVID-19 studies, The Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Mental Health: A Study of Private Healthcare Claims.
A paper released in Dec. 2020 by US National Bureau of Economic Research estimates an excess death of 890,000 Americans over the next 15 years due to the unemployment caused by Covid lockdowns.
Stanford epidemiologists’ study in Eur J Clin Invest: “lockdowns” did NOT control Covid-19 in either the spring or winter surges, & there were “numerous harms of aggressive measures” including potentially more Covid-19 deaths among the vulnerable elderly.
This study observed 2020 had the biggest increase in poverty in a single year since the government began tracking these figures in the 1960s.
This study concludes that “missed instruction during 2020 could be associated with an estimated 5.53 million years of life lost.”
One study, published by the Lancet, predicts over 3,000 excess cancer deaths in the UK within five years. That’s because of delays in cancer diagnosis– and consequent treatment — due to COVID-19 restrictions.
The CDC recently released it’s new “excess death” stats that show 100,967 people died this year who shouldn’t have and they were not Covid-19 deaths. The largest percentage was adults aged 25-44…
California doctors say “we’ve seen a year’s worth of suicide attempts in the last four weeks” because of the impact lockdown is having on mental health.
“The proportion of emergency room visits for mental health concerns in children & adolescents increased substantially this past Mar.-Oct.” CDC
According to the CDC, one quarter of American young adults have thought about committing suicide since the beginning of this panic epidemic.
In Canada, “Cancer surgeons in Ontario are reporting a sharp rise in the number of people coming to hospital with advanced cancers. It’s an unintended consequence of the sudden shutdown of non-urgent health-care services during the spring wave of COVID-19.“
It was already found prior to quarantine that social isolation can cause or exacerbate mental health conditions in children, and that loneliness in childhood can cause mental health problems up to almost a decade later.
Canadian report says “Opioid deaths skyrocket, mental health suffers due to pandemic restrictions”
San Francisco December 2020: Suicides are elevated compared to 2019 and account for nearly 4 times the number of deaths than deaths with Covid-19.
On December 17th, 2020 the CDC issued a report indicating “approximately 81,230 drug overdose deaths occurred in the U.S. in the 12-months ending in May 2020“, a new record. “The increases in drug overdose deaths appear to have accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic“
Ultimately it’s becoming apparent that Lockdowns May Have Had Little Effect on COVID-19 Spread
This study published in January 2021, concluded about the lockdowns “…we find no clear, significant beneficial effect of mrNPIs (more restrictive non-pharmaceutical interventions) on case growth in any country.“
“New data suggest that social distancing and reopening haven’t determined the spread.” The Wall Street Journal
“265 million people are expected to be thrown into severe food insecurity.” The Lancet
If you are advocating for lockdowns, you are advocating for some portion of the population to be consigned to death.
As of March 25th, 2021: Only 3 % of people admitted to ER’s are Covid related.“During week 43, the percentages of ED visits captured in NSSP for CLI (Covid Like Illness) and ILI(influenza like illness), were 3.0% and 1.1%, respectively” Oct. 30th 2020 CDC Covid Weekly (page 4)
According to the MN Department of Health’s Response Capacity report, as of March 25th, 2021, out of over 5 million residents in MN, there are 93 people in the ICU. This is a tiny fraction of the entire ICU capacity.
According to U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, as of January 5th,2021, 71.3 capacity, with 17.7% occupied by C19 patients; ICU total capacity=63.2%
Hospitals are laying off employees and some are shutting down:
If the hospitals were strained with Covid patients, they wouldn’t be laying off their employees and closing down facilities like “Bethesda” hospital in St. Paul which was specially reconfigured to treat Covid patients. During this “crisis” this is the last hospital you’d expect to see shut down due to financial losses…
Let’s talk about masking up in mn
This study on Nanofibre health risk states “…new kinds of nanofibres being made…might pose a risk because they have a similar shape to asbestos.”
“Nanofibres…are about 1,000 times smaller than the width of a human hair and can reach the lung cavity when inhaled…may lead to cancer (mesothelioma)…caused by breathing in asbestos fibres, which are similar to nanofibres.”
researchers studying the inhalation of micro(nano)plastics through atmospheric or anthropogenic sources are now facing the reality that there is a piece of plastic garment on top of the mouth and nose for millions of people every day.
Joe Rogan: “I see people walking around with masks on wearing gloves, is that nonsense?”
So if masks are ineffective in preventing flu how can they be effective with preventing Covid-19 transmission when it’s believed to be similar? “Most experts think that flu viruses spread mainly by droplets made when people with flu cough, sneeze or talk,” says the CDC
More On PCR False Positives…
"The reliability of COVID-19 tests is uncertain due to the limited evidence base. Available evidence mainly comes from symptomatic patients, and their clinical role in detecting asymptomatic carriers is unclear. There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests."
"caution needs to be applied to the results as it often does not detect infectious virus. PCR results may lead to restrictions for large groups of people who do not present an infection risk."
"Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms. The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection. This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens."
"It has been widely reported that the RT-qPCR [Reverse Transcriptase quantitative PCR] test kits used to detect SARSCoV-2 RNA in human specimens are generating many false positive results and are not sensitive enough to detect some real positive cases."
"I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine."
Dr. David Rasnick, biochemist and protease developer.
"The challenge is the false positive rate is very high, so only seven percent of tests will be successful in identifying those that actually have the the virus. So the truth is, we can’t just rely on that…”
"A positive RT-qPCR result may not necessarily mean the person is still infectious or that he or she still has any meaningful disease."
“To Interpret the SARS-CoV-2 Test, Consider the Cycle Threshold Value”